From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Bon Aire Condominium IV Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 16, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated October 17, 1995, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find unpersuasive the plaintiffs' claim that the verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence. It is well settled that a jury verdict will not be set aside absent a showing that the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence ( Vebeliunas v American Natl. Fire Ins. Co., 156 AD2d 555, 556; Maldonado v Sunshine, 156 AD2d 341; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133). A review of the evidence adduced in this case demonstrates that a fair basis existed for the verdict in the defendant's favor.

We have reviewed the plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Peck v. Bon Aire Condominium IV Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Peck v. Bon Aire Condominium IV Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN T. PECK et al., Appellants, v. BON AIRE CONDOMINIUM IV ASSOCIATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Senno v. Picture Cars East, Inc.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the verdict on the issue of damages was not against the weight of the…

Pelosi v. TJA Maintenance Programming

On appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the verdict was inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence.…