From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peccia v. State Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2021
2:18-cv-03049 JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-03049 JAM-AC

07-20-2021

JACK PECCIA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 84). Plaintiff asks this Court to set aside its Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 76). That Order incorrectly states that no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations were filed. Plaintiff did timely file his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order on June 7, 2021 (ECF No. 72). The court has now reviewed and considered Plaintiff's objections and still finds the Magistrate Judge's May 17, 2021 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

Peccia v. State Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2021
2:18-cv-03049 JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Peccia v. State Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:JACK PECCIA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 20, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-03049 JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)