From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peavey v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Sep 9, 2020
302 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

affirming convictions and sentences in Anders appeal but remanding to correct scrivener's error

Summary of this case from Bailey v. State

Opinion

No. 4D19-3958

09-09-2020

Steven Joseph PEAVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Celia Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Celia Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Appellant Steven Peavey appeals his judgment and sentence following a plea. We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of the written sentencing orders to conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement.

Appellant entered an open plea to burglary of a conveyance (count one) and grand theft (count two). The trial court orally sentenced him to three years in prison on count one and five years of probation on count two, with the probation to be served consecutively to the sentence on count one. However, the court entered a written sentencing order incorrectly reflecting that it imposed a split sentence and a written probation order incorrectly reflecting that it imposed prison time to be served during the term of probation.

On remand, the trial court shall amend the written orders to reflect that it did not impose a split sentence or prison time to be served during the term of probation. See Williams v. State , 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007) (recognizing that the court's oral pronouncement of a sentence controls over an inconsistent written sentencing document); Raya v. State , 183 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (affirming the convictions and sentences in an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of a scrivener's error in the written sentencing order). Appellant need not be present for this ministerial action.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Gross, Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peavey v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Sep 9, 2020
302 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

affirming convictions and sentences in Anders appeal but remanding to correct scrivener's error

Summary of this case from Bailey v. State
Case details for

Peavey v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN JOSEPH PEAVEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 9, 2020

Citations

302 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. State

Appellant need not be present for this ministerial action. Peavey v. State , 302 So. 3d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 4th…

Bailey v. State

Appellant need not be present for this ministerial action. Peavey v. State, 302 So.3d 1079, 1080 (Fla.…