From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 25, 2023
1:17-cr-361-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2023)

Opinion

1:17-cr-361-1 1:20-cv-610

08-25-2023

RAHSAAN DIANTE PEARSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On August 4, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 124, 125.) No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.

The court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 124), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and Response to Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (Doc. 95), is GRANTED, and that Petitioner's Section 2255 Motion, (Doc. 87), is DENIED. The court further finds there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, therefore a certificate of appealability is not issued.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Pearson v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 25, 2023
1:17-cr-361-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Pearson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAHSAAN DIANTE PEARSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 25, 2023

Citations

1:17-cr-361-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2023)