From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 2010
34 So. 3d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3D10-901.

April 16, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Amy Weber, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Forrest L. Andrews, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, JJ.


On this record, the defendant was in direct criminal contempt of the trial court because of his refusal to obey a clear, unambiguous directive in open court. We therefore affirm the trial judge's order. Based on the circumstances of this case, including that the intended purpose of the contempt was achieved, the defendant was ultimately acquitted of the charges after serving substantial time in jail prior to trial, and he has now served over one month incarceration post-trial on the contempt charge, we are of the opinion that the defendant's immediate release with credit for time served is appropriate. We trust that the trial court will immediately mitigate the sentence accordingly.

This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing of any motion for rehearing.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pearson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 2010
34 So. 3d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Pearson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leroy PEARSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

Citations

34 So. 3d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)