From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. O'Connor

United States District of Court, District of Columbia
Mar 19, 1942
8 F.R.D. 432 (D.D.C. 1942)

Opinion

         March 19, May 26, and July 14, 1942.

         Action by Drew Pearson, and others, against John J. O'Connor, and others.

         Complaint dismissed.

         See also 2 F.R.D. 521.

          Roberts & McInnis, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

          William F. Cusick, of Washington, D. C., for defendants.


          BAILEY, Associate Justice.

         Apart from any question as to the effect of the failure of the plaintiffs to reply to the defendants request for admission of the truth of certain facts, I am satisfied that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

         The allegations of conspiracy are immaterial save as forming a basis for joint liability. Cooper v. O'Connor, 69 App.D.C. 100, 99 F.2d 135, 118 A.L.R. 1440. If the suit be one for abuse of process, there being no allegation that the plaintiffs were arrested, or their property seized, or any injunction issued or cloud cast upon the title to any of their property, there is no cause of action. Silverman v. Ufa Eastern Division Distribution, 135 Misc. 814, 236 N.Y.S. 18; if for malicious use of process or malicious prosecution, the suit is premature.

         The complaint should be dismissed.

         The memorandum filed on May 26, 1942, was based on a misapprehension, and will be withdrawn.


Summaries of

Pearson v. O'Connor

United States District of Court, District of Columbia
Mar 19, 1942
8 F.R.D. 432 (D.D.C. 1942)
Case details for

Pearson v. O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:PEARSON et al. v. O'CONNOR et al.

Court:United States District of Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Mar 19, 1942

Citations

8 F.R.D. 432 (D.D.C. 1942)