Pearson v. Miller

Full title: SAM J. PEARSON IV, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY R. MILLER, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 23, 2006

Case No. 3:06cv174/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cv174/MCR/EMT.

October 23, 2006

ORDER

M. RODGERS, Magistrate Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 15, 2006. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of mandamus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.