From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Vogt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 1, 2017
Civ. No. 6:16-cv-01978-JR (D. Or. Jun. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6:16-cv-01978-JR

06-01-2017

NICHOLAS D. PEARSON, Petitioner, v. JUDGE DEBRA VOGT, Respondent.


OPINION and ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct.

Therefore, Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted in its entirety and Pearson's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1st day of June, 2017.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pearson v. Vogt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 1, 2017
Civ. No. 6:16-cv-01978-JR (D. Or. Jun. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Pearson v. Vogt

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS D. PEARSON, Petitioner, v. JUDGE DEBRA VOGT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 1, 2017

Citations

Civ. No. 6:16-cv-01978-JR (D. Or. Jun. 1, 2017)