Opinion
3:21-cv-00363-MMD-CLB
01-18-2023
DWANVAE PEARSON, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pro se Plaintiff Dwanvae Pearson brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Carla L. Baldwin (ECF No. 24), recommending that the Court dismiss this action for Pearson's failure to comply with Local Rule IA 3-1. Pearson had until January 13, 2023 to file an objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has been filed. For this reason, and as explained below, the Court adopts the R&R in full and dismisses this action.
The R&R was returned as undeliverable. (ECF No. 25.) However, it is Pearson's responsibility to file notification of any change of mailing address. See LR IA 3-1.
Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review and is satisfied Judge Baldwin did not clearly err. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the magistrate judges' findings and recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis in original). Here, Judge Baldwin recommends dismissing this action because Pearson has failed to update his address with the Court in accordance with Local Rule IA 3-1 or otherwise indicate an intent to prosecute this action, and all the relevant factors weigh in favor of dismissal. (ECF No. 24 at 1-2.) The Court agrees with Judge Baldwin. Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.
It is therefore ordered that Judge Baldwin's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) is accepted and adopted in full.
It is further ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case.