From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Caudle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1992
593 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2315.

February 19, 1992.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; John L. Phillips, Judge.

Christopher J. Rush, Lantana, for appellant.

Elizabeth A. Wilkins, Boca Raton, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order which provided that temporary residential custody of the children be with the father in Florida pending the court's resolution of the wife's petition to permit her to move to North Carolina with the children. In affirming, we stress that the temporary decision should in no way affect the court's final resolution of the relocation and custody issues. We believe the trial court has considerable discretion to decide what temporary arrangements should prevail under these circumstances. We also note that the court agreed to decide the case on an expedited basis so that any disruption in the lives of the children would be minimized.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER, and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pearson v. Caudle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1992
593 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Pearson v. Caudle

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN PEARSON, F/K/A ELLEN CAUDLE, APPELLANT, v. GARY JACK CAUDLE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 19, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Swartsell v. Swartsell

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in resolving the issue of temporary custody of the…

Saenz v. Saenz

Instead, the applicable doctrine is that rulings on temporary relief do not affect later orders on the same…