From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Callahan

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 24, 2008
552 U.S. 1279 (2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Pearson, the Court directed the parties to brief and argue the question: "Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) should be overruled?"

Summary of this case from Carepartners LLC v. Lashway
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

No. 07–751.

2008-03-24

Cordell PEARSON, et al., petitioners, v. Afton CALLAHAN.

Case below, 494 F.3d 891.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the Court's decision in *1703 Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) should be overruled?

Summaries of

Pearson v. Callahan

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 24, 2008
552 U.S. 1279 (2008)

In Pearson, the Court directed the parties to brief and argue the question: "Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) should be overruled?"

Summary of this case from Carepartners LLC v. Lashway

directing the parties to "brief and argue the following question: `Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 should be overruled?'"

Summary of this case from Wheeler v. Lawson

directing parties to brief and argue "Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 should be overruled?"

Summary of this case from Phelan v. Village of Lyons

directing the parties to "brief and argue the following question: `Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 should be overruled?'"

Summary of this case from Purtell v. Mason

directing the parties to "brief and argue the following question: 'Whether the Court's decision in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 should be overruled?'"

Summary of this case from Messer v. Indiana State Police

In Pearson v. Callahan, 128 S.Ct. 1702 (March 24, 2008), the Supreme Court directed the parties to address whether Saucier should be overruled.

Summary of this case from Simmons v. Gillespie
Case details for

Pearson v. Callahan

Case Details

Full title:Cordell PEARSON, et al., petitioners, v. Afton CALLAHAN.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 24, 2008

Citations

552 U.S. 1279 (2008)
128 S. Ct. 1702
170 L. Ed. 2d 512
77 U.S.L.W. 3017

Citing Cases

Redding v. Safford

It is not necessary, therefore, to defer decision pending the Supreme Court's decision whether to overrule…

Young v. Garfield County

Gross v. Pirtle, 245 F.3d 1151, 1156 (10th Cir. 2001). The Supreme Court recently has granted certiorari and…

29 Citing Cases