From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 8, 2013
Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP

01-08-2013

ANTONIO PEARSON, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY BEARD, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.S 636(b) (1), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 21, 2011, docket no. 17, screening the amended complaint under 28 U.S.C.S 1915A and recommending that some defendants be dismissed and others served with he amended complaint. The plaintiff was notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. After one extension of time was granted and a second one denied, plaintiff filed untimely objections. Meanwhile, the matter proceeded to service on the remaining defendants, who filed a motion to dismiss, docket no. 46. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on December 10, 2012, docket no. 50, noting that plaintiff had not filed a reply to the motion to dismiss and recommending that the remaining defendants' motion to dismiss be granted.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record and the Reports and Recommendations and noting the lack of timely objections, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the moving defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 46, is granted. The Reports and Recommendations are adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

BY THE COURT:

________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Antonio Pearson BL-0521
S.C.I. Coal Township
1 Kelley Drive
Coal Township, PA 17866-1021


Summaries of

Pearson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 8, 2013
Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Pearson v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO PEARSON, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Glass v. Rozum

Glass offers no allegation that the administrative appeals took an excessive amount of time to decide or were…