From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 28, 2013
Case No. 3:09-CV-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-CV-54-KRG-KAP

02-28-2013

ANTONIO PEARSON, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY BEARD, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The motion filed at docket no. 55, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.S 636(b), and Local Civil Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on February 11, 2013, docket no. 57, considering the untimely objections at docket no. 56 to be incorporated into the motion and recommending that the motion be denied.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the motion to reconsider or to vacate the judgment, docket no. 55, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Antonio Pearson BL-0521

S.C.I. Coal Township

1 Kelley Drive

Coal Township, PA 17866-1021


Summaries of

Pearson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 28, 2013
Case No. 3:09-CV-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Pearson v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO PEARSON, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:09-CV-54-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2013)