From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearlson v. Javits

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

July 1, 1963


In an action by three sisters of the defendant to impress a trust on certain assets in the defendant's possession, which are alleged to be properly a part of the estate of their father, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 4, 1962 on the decision of a Special Referee rendered following an inquest taken before said Referee after the defendant's attorney had withdrawn his appearance and had refused to participate in the trial or to produce the defendant. The judgment granted to the plaintiffs the relief prayed for by them in their second amended complaint. Appeal dismissed, with costs. A judgment resulting from an inquest occasioned by the failure or refusal of a party to appear at the trial is deemed a default judgment from which no appeal lies ( Jensen v. Union Ry. Co., 260 N.Y. 1, 4; Prashker, New York Practice [4th ed.], p. 991. Ughetta, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pearlson v. Javits

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Pearlson v. Javits

Case Details

Full title:ROSE PEARLSON et al., Respondents, v. ETHEL JAVITS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Ryan

Considering all of the circumstances, we conclude the court was well within its discretion to find appellant…

Intrabartolo v. Intrabartolo

Appeal by defendant from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 21, 1971,…