From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearl-Wick Corporation v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1988
71 N.Y.2d 823 (N.Y. 1988)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1988

Decided March 17, 1988

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, David Edwards, Jr., J.

Harold S. Elovich for appellant.

T. Gorman Reilly and Joseph A. Vogel for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs. For the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum ( 125 A.D.2d 249), the first, second and fourth causes of action were barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the third cause of action was properly dismissed for failure to state a valid basis for relief.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and DILLON.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.


Summaries of

Pearl-Wick Corporation v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1988
71 N.Y.2d 823 (N.Y. 1988)
Case details for

Pearl-Wick Corporation v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Case Details

Full title:PEARL-WICK CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 17, 1988

Citations

71 N.Y.2d 823 (N.Y. 1988)
527 N.Y.S.2d 756
522 N.E.2d 1054

Citing Cases

Medallion Fin. Corp. v. Rucker

In addition, respondent's claimed defense - that the judgment obtained by petitioner is invalid because it…