From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearl Asset Mgmt. v. Bretz Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 18, 2024
23-CV-10687 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-10687 (LTS)

01-18-2024

PEARL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, Plaintiff, v. BRETZ GROUP, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Pearl Asset Management LLC filed this action pro se, did not indicate that it was represented by an attorney, and did not pay the $405.00 in fees to bring this action. By order dated December 12, 2023, the Court informed Plaintiff that the matter would be dismissed without prejudice unless, within 30 days from the date of that order, an attorney representing Plaintiff filed a notice of appearance on its behalf, and paid the fees. An attorney has not filed a notice of appearance on Plaintiff's behalf, and the fees have not been paid. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pearl Asset Mgmt. v. Bretz Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 18, 2024
23-CV-10687 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Pearl Asset Mgmt. v. Bretz Grp.

Case Details

Full title:PEARL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, Plaintiff, v. BRETZ GROUP, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 18, 2024

Citations

23-CV-10687 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2024)