From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peake v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 4, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-001271 (S.C. Mar. 4, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001271 Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-008

03-04-2015

Tijuan Peake, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General J. Rutledge Johnson, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal from Union County
The Honorable Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General J. Rutledge Johnson, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the circuit court's dismissal of Tijuan Peake application for post-conviction relief. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peake v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 4, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-001271 (S.C. Mar. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Peake v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tijuan Peake, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-001271 (S.C. Mar. 4, 2015)