From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peake v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 8, 1933
58 S.W.2d 87 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 15902.

Delivered March 8, 1933.

Appeal — Statement of Facts — Procedure.

Motion to postpone, exceptions to reception of evidence, and complaints of charge of court not reviewable in the absence of the statement of facts.

Appeal from the District Court of Gregg County. Tried below before the Hon. Will C. Hurst, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for forgery; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

V. L. Shurtleff, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard on the trial is not brought up for review. The motion to postpone, the exceptions to the reception of evidence, and the complaints of the charge of the court cannot be reviewed in the absence of the statement of facts.

Perceiving no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Peake v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 8, 1933
58 S.W.2d 87 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
Case details for

Peake v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEASON PEAKE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 8, 1933

Citations

58 S.W.2d 87 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
123 Tex. Crim. 138