From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peacock v. Nims

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 21, 1968
207 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 36969.

February 21, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

William W. Henderson, Jr., of Fisher Hepner, Pensacola, for petitioners.

Jack S. Graff, of Levin, Askew, Warfield, Levin Graff, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 26, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peacock v. Nims

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 21, 1968
207 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Peacock v. Nims

Case Details

Full title:FRED PEACOCK ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. JOHN C. NIMS ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 21, 1968

Citations

207 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1968)