From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peacock v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was injured while ice skating at Manhattan Square Park and has alleged that her injuries resulted from defendant's negligent supervision of a potentially dangerous activity. Defendant has failed to establish as a matter of law that its supervision could not have been negligent (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065; Noeller v County of Erie, 145 A.D.2d 919).


Summaries of

Peacock v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Peacock v. City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY PEACOCK, Respondent, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 938