From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peacock v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 3, 2008
3:06cv67/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2008)

Opinion

3:06cv67/MCR/MD.

July 3, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 2, 2008. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for authorization of attorney fees (doc. 24) is GRANTED and the Commissioner is directed to disburse $12,748.38 to plaintiff's counsel, Quinn E. Brock, Esq., as reasonable attorney fees under Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peacock v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 3, 2008
3:06cv67/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Peacock v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE PEACOCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 3, 2008

Citations

3:06cv67/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2008)