From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P.C. v. R.W.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2020
185 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

1184 Dkt. V-12071-18/19A

07-16-2020

In re P.C., III, Petitioner–Appellant, v. R.W., Respondent–Respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Oing, Singh, JJ.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Keith E. Brown, J.), entered on or about October 10, 2019, which dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by petitioner's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967] ; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1st Dept. 1976] ). A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on this appeal. As the subject child had not resided in New York for six consecutive months immediately before the habeas petition was filed, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the petition (see Domestic Relations Law § 76–b ; 76[1][a]; 75–a[7]; Matter of Renaldo R. v. Chanice R., 131 A.D.3d 885, 16 N.Y.S.3d 544 [1st Dept. 2015] ).


Summaries of

P.C. v. R.W.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2020
185 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

P.C. v. R.W.

Case Details

Full title:In re P.C., III, Petitioner–Appellant, v. R.W., Respondent–Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 16, 2020

Citations

185 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
185 A.D.3d 500