PB&J Towing Svc., I&II, LLC v. Hines

4 Citing cases

  1. Quezergue v. Gunn

    3:22-CV-00092 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 25, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    Rapp v. Dutcher, 557 Fed.Appx. 444, 450 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing Bauss v. Plymouth Twp., 233 F. App'x. 490, 500 (6th Cir. 2007)); see Wiley v. Oberlin Police Dep't, 330 Fed.Appx. 524, 530 (6th Cir. 2009) (“[Plaintiff] cannot succeed on a conspiracy claim because there was no underlying constitutional violation that injured her.”). Having dismissed the individual panel members because [the plaintiff] has not sufficiently alleged that they violated its due process rights, [the plaintiff's] conspiracy claim against them also fails. PB&J Towing Serv., I&II, LLC v. Hines, No. 2:18-CV-2556, 2020 WL 236745, at *8 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2020). The same applies to the instant case; because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against any Defendant for a violation of his constitutional rights, Plaintiff's Section 1983 civil conspiracy claims against all Defendants also fail.

  2. Kuilan v. Zimmerman

    1:22-CV-00010 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    Rapp v. Dutcher, 557 Fed.Appx. 444, 450 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing Bauss v. Plymouth Twp., 233 F. App'x. 490, 500 (6th Cir. 2007)); see Wiley v. Oberlin Police Dep't, 330 Fed.Appx. 524, 530 (6th Cir. 2009) (“[Plaintiff] cannot succeed on a conspiracy claim because there was no underlying constitutional violation that injured her.”). Having dismissed the individual panel members because [the plaintiff] has not sufficiently alleged that they violated its due process rights, [the plaintiff's] conspiracy claim against them also fails. PB&J Towing Serv., I&II, LLC v. Hines, No. 2:18-CV-2556, 2020 WL 236745, at *8 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2020). The same applies to the instant case; because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against any Defendant for a violation of his constitutional rights, Plaintiff's Section 1983 civil conspiracy claims against all Defendants also fail.

  3. Illum'Maati v. Bailey

    No. 3:20-cv-00546 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2021)

    Rapp v. Dutcher, 557 F. App'x 444, 450 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing Bauss v. Plymouth Twp., 233 F. App'x. 490, 500 (6th Cir. 2007)); see Wiley v. Oberlin Police Dep't, 330 F. App'x 524, 530 (6th Cir. 2009) ("[Plaintiff] cannot succeed on a conspiracy claim because there was no underlying constitutional violation that injured her."). Having dismissed the individual panel members because [the plaintiff] has not sufficiently alleged that they violated its due process rights, [the plaintiff's] conspiracy claim against them also fails.PB&J Towing Serv., I&II, LLC v. Hines, No. 2:18-CV-2556, 2020 WL 236745, at *8 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2020). The same applies to the instant case; because the plaintiff has failed to state a claim against any defendant for a violation of his constitutional rights, the plaintiff's § 1983 civil conspiracy claim against all defendants also fails.

  4. Wortman v. Tenn. Bd. of Parole

    No. 3:20-cv-00156 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 3, 2020)   Cited 3 times

    no underlying constitutional violation that injured her."). Having dismissed the individual panel members because [the plaintiff] has not sufficiently alleged that they violated its due process rights, [the plaintiff's] conspiracy claim against them also fails.PB&J Towing Serv., I&II, LLC v. Hines, No. 2:18-CV-2556, 2020 WL 236745, at *8 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2020). The same applies to the instant case; because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against any of the defendants for a violation of his constitutional rights, Plaintiff's §1983 civil conspiracy claim against them also fails.