From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paz v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 30, 2016
Case No. ED CV 16-0011 DSF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 16-0011 DSF (JCG)

06-30-2016

PATRICK F. PAZ, SR., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. // // // // //

Plaintiff's address of record is Valley State Prison, P.O. Box 96, Chowchilla, CA 93610. [See Dkt. No. 1.] However, mail sent to Plaintiff at that address has been returned undelivered by the U.S. Postal Service. [See Dkt. Nos. 36-37.] Plaintiff has failed to apprise the Court of any change of address, as mandated by Local Rule 41-6. See L.R. 41-6. --------

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. DATED: 6/30/16

/s/_________

HON. DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Paz v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 30, 2016
Case No. ED CV 16-0011 DSF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Paz v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK F. PAZ, SR., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 30, 2016

Citations

Case No. ED CV 16-0011 DSF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)