From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paz v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1985
478 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

Nos. 85-515, 85-1451 and 85-1974.

November 5, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Leonard Rivkind, J.

Magill Lewis and R. Fred Lewis, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, Hunter, Angones, Adams, Adams McClure and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


We reverse the summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Resolution of the insured's action against the tortfeasor was not a prerequisite to arbitration of the insured's claim for uninsured motorist benefits. Arrieta v. Volkswagen Insurance Co., 343 So.2d 918 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Allstate's refusal to arbitrate the uninsured motorist claim was, in effect, a denial of coverage and a breach of contract. Having breached the contract, Allstate cannot attempt to avoid liability by relying on a provision prohibiting the insured from settling with the tortfeasor without its consent. Aristonico Infante v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co., 364 So.2d 874 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Accordingly, the final summary judgment, and the accompanying judgment for costs, are

Reversed.


Summaries of

Paz v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1985
478 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Paz v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID R. PAZ, M.D., APPELLANT, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 5, 1985

Citations

478 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

U.S. Fire Insurance Co. v. Mikes

Under these circumstances, Mikes/SCC contend that all they need show to enforce the settlement is coverage, a…

Wegener v. Int'l Bankers Ins. Co.

We reverse upon the holdings that (a) the jury could properly have found that the insurer's purported…