From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PAYO v. RUSTIN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1147.

September 28, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff David Payo's ("Plaintiff") Complaint, which alleges violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was received by this Court on August 18, 2008. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. Plaintiff amended his Complaint on March 17, 2009 (Doc. 41), omitting some previously-named defendants. These former-defendants were terminated from this case on that date.

The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 26, 2010 (Doc. 79), in which it was recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Rustin and Paige (Doc. 65) be granted. The Magistrate Judge's Report also recommended that the First Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Patterson, Dixon and Allegheny Correctional Health Services, Inc. (Doc. 68) be granted. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail at his address of record. The parties were allowed until September 24, 2010, to file objections. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of Sep, 2010,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Rustin and Paige (Doc. 65) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Patterson, Dixon, and Allegheny County Correctional Health Services, Inc. (Doc. 68) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judge Bissoon's Report and Recommendation of August 26, 2010 (Doc. 79) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this case.


Summaries of

PAYO v. RUSTIN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2010)
Case details for

PAYO v. RUSTIN

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PAYO, Plaintiff, v. RAMON RUSTIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 28, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2010)