From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2009
No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P.

October 15, 2009


ORDER


Settlement negotiations have concluded. Therefore, plaintiff's counsel has been relieved. See August 7, 2009 Order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1) Within fifteen days, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he is ready to proceed with this action or whether he requests another stay. If plaintiff requests a stay, he is directed to explain his reasons for his request.

2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Michael Newdow as counsel for plaintiff and reinstate plaintiff as proceeding pro se.


Summaries of

Payne v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2009
No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Payne v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MARK PAYNE Plaintiff, v. BRETT WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)