Opinion
1:22-CV-559
03-22-2023
JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff v. L. WHITE, et al., Defendants
ORDER
Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge
AND NOW, THIS 22nd DAY OF MARCH, 2023, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report & Recommendation (“R&R") (Doc. 46), Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. 47), and all other relevant documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. 46) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein.
2. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 47) are OVERRULED. Plaintiff raises three generalized objections, none of which set forth any legal or factual basis for the stated objection. Upon review of the R&R, Plaintiffs Complaint, and the relevant documents of record, the Court agrees with Judge Carlson's analysis of Plaintiff's claims, the relevant law, and the conclusion that Defendants White and Mason are entitled to be dismissed from this action.
3. The “Commonwealth Defendants' Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Defendants White and Mason are DISMISSED from the above-captioned action.
4. The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings consistent with this Order.