From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Stratton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P.

August 15, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On September 15, 2006, defendants Brimhall, Smith and B. Williams filed a motion to dismiss. Despite being given extensions of time to do so, plaintiff still has not filed an opposition. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff file an opposition to the September 15, 2006 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Brimhall, Smith and B. Williams within fifteen days of this order. Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition within fifteen days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Any reply to the opposition shall be filed and served within five days of service of the opposition.


Summaries of

Payne v. Stratton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Payne v. Stratton

Case Details

Full title:MARK L. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. G. STRATTON, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1585 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)