From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 25, 1961
365 P.2d 832 (Okla. Crim. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. A-13031.

October 25, 1961.

An appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County; C.E. Allen, Trial Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Howard Cecile Payne, was convicted of the crime of driving without a driver's license while under suspension, second offense, and appeals. Affirmed.

Thomas Dee Frasier, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Robert D. Simms, County Atty., Tulsa County, Ted Flanagan, Asst. County Atty., Tulsa County, Tulsa, for defendant in error.


Howard Cecile Payne, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information in the Court of Common Pleas of the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, with driving without a driver's license while under suspension, second offense; was tried before a jury, found guilty and punishment affixed at $200 and 90 days in the county jail.

Within the time granted for filing petition in error and case made, appeal was perfected to this court. A brief in support of petition in error was due to have been filed in this Court not later than May 1, 1961, but to date no brief has been filed, nor were appearances made when this case came on for oral argument on the July 26, 1961 docket of this court.

Finding no fundamental error in the record, and by reason of the uniform holding of this court, the judgment and sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, is affirmed.

BRETT and BUSSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Payne v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 25, 1961
365 P.2d 832 (Okla. Crim. App. 1961)
Case details for

Payne v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD CECILE PAYNE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DEFENDANT…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 25, 1961

Citations

365 P.2d 832 (Okla. Crim. App. 1961)
1961 OK CR 108