From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 25, 2004
885 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 5D03-2091.

May 25, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, James C. Dauksch, Senior Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rosemarie Farrell, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and, Timothy D. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Ned Payne appealed his sentence which was imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crime of theft. Having found no merit in the issues raised in Payne's initial brief, we issued a per curiam affirmance. Payne filed a motion for rehearing requesting that this court recall its decision based upon the fact that defense counsel had not received a copy of the State's answer brief and therefore he had not had the opportunity to file a reply brief. We granted Payne leave to file a reply brief; however, upon review thereof, we conclude that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, we deny Payne's motion for rehearing.

DENIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 25, 2004
885 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Payne v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ned P. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 25, 2004

Citations

885 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)