From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 10, 2006
920 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 5D05-2574.

February 10, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, W. David Dugan, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Michael Payne appeals the order finding him in violation of probation. His sole issue on appeal is that the court failed to enter a written order stating which conditions the court found that he had violated. Payne is correct that such an order is necessary. Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Payne's probation, but remand for the entry of a proper order.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

PLEUS, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 10, 2006
920 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Payne v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

920 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Viveiros v. State

However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order to specifically reflect the conditions of…

McCoy v. State

We remand this case to the trial court to enter a corrected order identifying the conditions McCoy violated.…