From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Siegrist

Court of Appeals of Texas
Mar 28, 2012
No. 04-11-00833-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 04-11-00833-CV

03-28-2012

Richard PAYNE, Appellant v. Anna M. SIEGRIST, et al., Appellees


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-02-00040-CVK

Honorable Ron Carr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
DISMISSED

Appellant's brief, which was due on January 30, 2012, has not been filed. On February 15, 2012, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing within fifteen days why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a written response. Appellant's response, however, does not explain why he has failed to file an appellant's brief, does not request additional time to file an appellant's brief, and cannot be construed as an appellant's brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Payne v. Siegrist

Court of Appeals of Texas
Mar 28, 2012
No. 04-11-00833-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Payne v. Siegrist

Case Details

Full title:Richard PAYNE, Appellant v. Anna M. SIEGRIST, et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

No. 04-11-00833-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2012)