From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Cnty. of Merced

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
1:22-cv-00157-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00157-DAD-BAM

06-06-2022

JACOB PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 36)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 2, 2022, Plaintiff Jacob Payne and Defendants Thomas Pfeiff and Cindy Morse and Defendant County of Merced filed a stipulation to extend the time for Defendants Pfeiff and Morse to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 36.)

Having considered the stipulation, and good cause appearing, the stipulation extending the time for Defendants Pfeiff and Morse to respond to the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants Pfeiff and Morse shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint on or before July 11, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Payne v. Cnty. of Merced

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
1:22-cv-00157-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Payne v. Cnty. of Merced

Case Details

Full title:JACOB PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00157-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)