From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Baser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 29, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P

10-29-2019

JAVANCE ROSS PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. C. BASER, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On July 26, 2019, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has been warned that failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff's amended complaint was due October 16, 2019 (id.) and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 29, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
payn0956.fta


Summaries of

Payne v. Baser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 29, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Payne v. Baser

Case Details

Full title:JAVANCE ROSS PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. C. BASER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2019)