From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2011
10 CV 2629 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2011)

Opinion

10 CV 2629 (BSJ).

May 9, 2011


Order


After having reviewed Magistrate Judge Katz's Report and Recommendation dated April 15, 2011, and having received no objections thereto, I hereby confirm and adopt the Report in its entirety, having been satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See King v. Greiner, No. 02 Civ. 5810 (DLC), 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009) (citation omitted); see also Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Accordingly, this action should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The party's failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED:

Dated: New York, New York

May 8, 2011


Summaries of

Payne v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2011
10 CV 2629 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Payne v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RONALD PAYNE; Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 9, 2011

Citations

10 CV 2629 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2011)