From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payan v. Vill. of Ruidoso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 26, 2013
No. 12-cv-1045 WJ/SMV (D.N.M. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-cv-1045 WJ/SMV

02-26-2013

APRIL PAYAN, Plaintiff, v. THE VILLAGE OF RUIDOSO, Defendant.


ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC RULE 16 SCHEUDLING CONFERENCE

A Rule 16 initial scheduling conference will be held by telephone on Tuesday, March 5, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. Counsel shall call Judge Vidmar's "Meet Me" line at 505-348-2357 to be connected to the proceedings. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following: discovery needs and scheduling, all claims and defenses, the use of scientific evidence and whether a Daubert hearing is needed, see Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 590-92 (1993), initial disclosures, and the timing of expert disclosures and reports under Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). We will also discuss settlement prospects, alternative dispute resolution possibilities, and consideration of consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Client attendance is not required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

STEFHAN M. VIDMAR

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Payan v. Vill. of Ruidoso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 26, 2013
No. 12-cv-1045 WJ/SMV (D.N.M. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Payan v. Vill. of Ruidoso

Case Details

Full title:APRIL PAYAN, Plaintiff, v. THE VILLAGE OF RUIDOSO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

No. 12-cv-1045 WJ/SMV (D.N.M. Feb. 26, 2013)