Paxton v. Sanderson

Full title: PATRICIA RAWLS PAXTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TUTRIX OF HER MINOR CHILD…

Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Jul 12, 2000

763 So. 2d 638 (La. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 32,313-CA

July 12, 2000.

On Remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court Originally Appealed from the Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ouachita, Louisiana, Trial Court No. 97-4058, Honorable R. W. Kostelka, Judge.

WRIGHT UNDERWOOD, By: Bobby N. Underwood, Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

HUDSON, POTTS BERNSTEIN, By: Gordon L. James, Counsel for Defendants-Appellants.

COTTON, BOLTON, HOYCHICK, DOUGHTY, By: John Hoychick, Jr., Counsel for Defendant-Appellee, State Farm.

Before BROWN, STEWART, GASKINS, CARAWAY and DREW, JJ.

BROWN, J.

This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La. 04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.

For the reasons set forth in Judge Gaskins' original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs' claims.