From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PAWLING SAV. BK. v. VSA BEDELL RD. ASSOCIATES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A motion to amend a pleading is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, whose determination will not lightly be set aside (see, Edenwald Contr. Co. v. City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 957; F.G.L. Knitting Mills v. 1087 Flushing Prop., 191 A.D.2d 533). Under the circumstances of this case, there is no reason to set aside the trial court's denial of the appellants' motion for leave to serve an amended answer (see, Courageous Syndicate v. People-To-People Sports Comm., 141 A.D.2d 599; cf., Noanjo Clothing v. L M Kids Fashions, 207 A.D.2d 436). Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PAWLING SAV. BK. v. VSA BEDELL RD. ASSOCIATES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

PAWLING SAV. BK. v. VSA BEDELL RD. ASSOCIATES

Case Details

Full title:PAWLING SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. VSA BEDELL ROAD ASSOCIATES et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 922
624 N.Y.S.2d 923