From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pawley v. Gains

Superior Court for Law and Equity, Washington District
Sep 1, 1806
1 Tenn. 208 (Tenn. Ch. 1806)

Opinion

September 1806.

Money levied by a sheriff by virtue of an execution, and held by him for its satisfaction, cannot be attached in his hands by garnishment. [See Drane v. McGavock, 7 H. 132; Atkinson v. Tucker, 1 Hum. 300.]


KENNEDY moved for judgment against James Phagan, sheriff of Sullivan. An execution had issued at the instance of the plaintiff against the defendant for $2,063.83, returnable to this term; upon which the sheriff returned that he had sold property to John Rhea to the amount of $665. That the money was attached in his hands on the 1st of September, 1806, and that he was summoned as garnishee, to appear at the next County Court of Sullivan, at the suit of Lawrence Snapp and James Gains, Sen., against said Pawley.

KENNEDY referred to a case in Douglass and another, in 1 Cranch, from which he said it appeared that money which had been levied, and was in the hands of an officer, could not be attached. Of this opinion was the Court, and therefore judgment for plaintiff against the sheriff.

See 1 Cr. 117; 3 Caines, 84, n.; Doug. 231; 4 East, 510; 5 Bos. Pull. 376; 9 East, 48; 5 Johns. 163; 2 Wil. ed. Bac. Ab. 715, n.

This motion was grounded upon the Act of 1803. c. 18.


Summaries of

Pawley v. Gains

Superior Court for Law and Equity, Washington District
Sep 1, 1806
1 Tenn. 208 (Tenn. Ch. 1806)
Case details for

Pawley v. Gains

Case Details

Full title:PAWLEY v. GAINS

Court:Superior Court for Law and Equity, Washington District

Date published: Sep 1, 1806

Citations

1 Tenn. 208 (Tenn. Ch. 1806)

Citing Cases

Massey v. Holmes

In the first volume of our Reports it was held that: "Money levied on by a sheriff by virtue of an execution,…