From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paviva v. Ropchock

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
2:21-CV-01898-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-01898-APG-VCF

10-31-2022

ROC CAMERON FETUAO PAVIVA, an individual; and ROLETTE PAIVA, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. JOSHUA THOMAS ROPCHOCK, an individual; FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., a foreign corporation; RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., a foreign corporation; CANYON LOGISTICS, INC., foreign corporation; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 10, inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS 11 through 20, inclusive; and ABC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 21 through 30, inclusive, Defendants.

Michael J. Nunez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10703 Daniel J. Klett, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14897 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP Attorneys for Defendants, JOSHUA THOMAS ROPCHOCK, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC. and CANYON LOGISTICS, INC. MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLPMichael J. Nunez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10703 Daniel J. Klett, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14897 Attorneys for Defendants NETTLES | MORRIS Brian D. Nettles, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7462 Christian M. Morris, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11218 Victoria R. Allen, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15005 Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Michael J. Nunez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10703 Daniel J. Klett, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14897 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP Attorneys for Defendants, JOSHUA THOMAS ROPCHOCK, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC. and CANYON LOGISTICS, INC.

MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLPMichael J. Nunez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10703 Daniel J. Klett, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14897 Attorneys for Defendants

NETTLES | MORRIS Brian D. Nettles, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7462 Christian M. Morris, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11218 Victoria R. Allen, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15005 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by Defendants JOSHUA THOMAS ROPCHOCK, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC. and CANYON LOGISTICS, INC., and Plaintiffs ROC CAMERON FETUAO PAVIVA and ROLETTE PAIVA, by and through their attorneys of record, that any and all claims among and between the above-named parties be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs incurred herein.

This Stipulation is entered into in good faith, in the interest of judicial economy, and not for the purposes of delay.

STIPULATED AND AGREED

ORDER

The Court having considered the aforementioned Stipulation between the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore;

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, each of the parties to bear its own fees and costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED any pending court dates related to this matter shall be vacated and removed from calendar.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.


Summaries of

Paviva v. Ropchock

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
2:21-CV-01898-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Paviva v. Ropchock

Case Details

Full title:ROC CAMERON FETUAO PAVIVA, an individual; and ROLETTE PAIVA, an…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-01898-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)