From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Sep 25, 2018
C.A. No. S14C-01-006 ESB (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 25, 2018)

Opinion

C.A. No. S14C-01-006 ESB

09-25-2018

RE: Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.


D. Miika Roggio, Esquire
Silver, McDonald & Friedman
1010 North Bancroft Parkway, Suite 22
Wilmington, DE 19805 Joseph R. Fowler, Esquire
Fowler Hirtzel McNulty Spaulding
2000 Market Street
Suite 550
Philadelphia, PA 19107 Louis J. Rizzo, Jr., Esquire
Reger Rizzo & Darnall LLP
1523 Concord Pike, Suite 200
Brandywine Plaza East
Wilmington, DE 19803 Dear Counsel:

I have denied George & Lynch Inc.'s Motion for Reargument of my decision granting summary judgment in favor of E. J. Breneman. George & Lynch Inc.'s motion raises the same arguments that I previously considered and rejected. I am satisfied that my earlier decision remains correct.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

/s/

E. Scott Bradley ESB:tll cc: Prothonotary's Office

Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Sep 25, 2018
C.A. No. S14C-01-006 ESB (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 25, 2018)
Case details for

Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RE: Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Sep 25, 2018

Citations

C.A. No. S14C-01-006 ESB (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 25, 2018)