From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pavia v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 25, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 5:10-cv-818 (GTS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 5:10-cv-818 (GTS/DEP)

09-25-2012

BRENDA OSBORNE PAVIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE


[ ] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. [×] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case is remanded back to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15). All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Judge Glenn T. Suddaby, dated the 25th day of September, 2012.

_______________

Clerk of Court

L. Welch

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Pavia v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 25, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 5:10-cv-818 (GTS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Pavia v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA OSBORNE PAVIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 5:10-cv-818 (GTS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2012)