From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pavey v. Recontrust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS

09-20-2011

BRIAN M. PAVEY and JANELLE PAVEY, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY N.A., Defendant.


ORDER

Pursuant to the court's order filed September 13, 2011 (Doc. No. 24), plaintiffs have filed a declaration in support of their motion for permission to file electronically as an exception to Local Rule 133(b)(2). Plaintiffs state that they have investigated this court's electronic filing requirements, have the necessary computer hardware and software, and will comply with all requirements for electronic filing in this court. Plaintiffs' motion to file electronically (Doc. No. 23) is granted, and plaintiffs shall register to file electronically forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pavey v. Recontrust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Pavey v. Recontrust Co.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. PAVEY and JANELLE PAVEY, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY N.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)