From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paulsen v. Paulsen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Dec 31, 1948
63 A.2d 306 (Me. 1948)

Opinion

Opinion, December 31, 1948.

Berman, Berman and Wernick, for plaintiff.

Elton H. Thompson, for defendant.

SITTING: STURGIS, C. J., THAXTER, MURCHIE, TOMPKINS, FELLOWS, MERRILL, JJ.


This case was entered in this court at the September Term, 1948, on a bill of exceptions allowed in the Superior Court where it was tried. The bill, for want of signature of exceptant and other errors, in pleading or procedure patent in the record as certified, is clearly insufficient.

The case is, therefore, remanded to any justice of the Superior Court for correction in term time or vacation, of the errors of pleading and procedure in or incident to the bill of exceptions, and the reentry of the case upon a corrected record at the February Term, 1949, of the Law Court.


Summaries of

Paulsen v. Paulsen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Dec 31, 1948
63 A.2d 306 (Me. 1948)
Case details for

Paulsen v. Paulsen

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR M. PAULSEN vs. HERMAN D. PAULSEN

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland

Date published: Dec 31, 1948

Citations

63 A.2d 306 (Me. 1948)
143 Me. 416

Citing Cases

Morneault v. B. M. Railroad

This raises a question of law upon which plaintiff is entitled to be heard. The rule is too well established…