From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paulo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 16, 2024
No. 20139-23 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

20139-23

02-16-2024

CHITO PAULO & CORAZON PAULO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On February 15, 2024, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that petitioners paid the tax liability for tax year 2021 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. See Bendheim v. Commissioner, 214 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir. 1954). In his motion to dismiss, respondent represents that petitioners do not object to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Paulo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 16, 2024
No. 20139-23 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Paulo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:CHITO PAULO & CORAZON PAULO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

No. 20139-23 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 16, 2024)