From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paulin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jul 9, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-00087-GZS (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-00087-GZS No. 2:12-cv-00290-GZS

07-09-2013

JUSTIN PAULIN, Movant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 24, 2013, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 101). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 103) and a Motion to Accept Objection (ECF No. 104) on June 17, 2013. Defendant's Motion to Accept his untimely filed Objection is hereby GRANTED.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is hereby ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion is summarily DENIED.
3. It is also hereby ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Paulin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jul 9, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-00087-GZS (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Paulin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN PAULIN, Movant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Jul 9, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-00087-GZS (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2013)