From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 14, 2012
84 So. 3d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10–2955.

03-14-2012

Willard Nathaniel PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Willard Nathaniel Paul, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Willard Nathaniel Paul, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Prior report: 20 So.3d 1005.

PER CURIAM.

Willard Paul appeals the summary denial of an amended rule 3.850 motion. Although the final order did not specifically address each of Paul's claims, the order dismissing his original 3.850 motion explained why each of the claims was insufficient, and Paul did not cure the deficiencies in his amended motion. Because his claims are facially insufficient and without merit, we affirm.

GROSS, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 14, 2012
84 So. 3d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Paul v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willard Nathaniel PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

84 So. 3d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)