From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 23, 2002
804 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D01-1880

Opinion filed January 23, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald C. Dresnick, Judge. Lower Tribunal Nos. 00-9281 00-13336.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and John D. Barker, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


We affirm Appellant's revocation of probation and sentence.

Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the written order of revocation does not conform with the oral pronouncements of the trial court. We agree.

The trial court concluded that Appellant did not violate condition seven by using alcohol to excess. It further found that Appellant did not violate the law when he was taken to the County jail. Accordingly, we remand this case with directions to strike any indications to the contrary from the written order.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final order revoking probation.


Summaries of

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 23, 2002
804 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Paul v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE LENARD PAUL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 23, 2002

Citations

804 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)