From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 14, 2012
No. 4D10-2955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10-2955

03-14-2012

WILLARD NATHANIEL PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Willard Nathaniel Paul, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Willard Paul appeals the summary denial of an amended rule 3.850 motion. Although the final order did not specifically address each of Paul's claims, the order dismissing his original 3.850 motion explained why each of the claims was insufficient, and Paul did not cure the deficiencies in his amended motion. Because his claims are facially insufficient and without merit, we affirm. GROSS, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562006CF002505A.

Willard Nathaniel Paul, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Paul v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 14, 2012
No. 4D10-2955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Paul v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLARD NATHANIEL PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

No. 4D10-2955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2012)